Inacia P. Carvalho v Desk To Desk Courier and Cargo Limited case study answer honorable court has held that even in case study solution event of Force Majeure a respondent cant plea for absolving of his duties and liabilities which he himself voluntarily took by case study answer agreement whose consent was also satisfy and is legal and enforceable and if that has happen then case study solution respondent is prone to compensate case study answer other events of case study solution contract and that Force Majeure and Act of god doesnt include every instances to cover up case study answer deficiency in their functions and their negligence. In this case case study solution honorable court also said that it is often believed in good faith that a matter of professionalism will always be shown by performing case study answer obligation of agreement and for escaping case study solution liabilities by asking case study answer plea of Force Majeure in any negligent unprofessional action is not appropriate. Hence, following case study solution words case study answer court in this case held case study answer respondent liable for not supplying case study answer courier with case study solution clause of urgent published above it on time and ordered case study solution same to compensate case study answer plaintiff. In case of Dharnrajmal Gobindram v. Shamji Kalidas case study solution honorable Supreme Court of India held that if case study answer clause of Force Majeure is not defined then case study solution contract can be deemed void.